Horizontal Pod Autoscaler with Custom Metrics

What is a Horizontal Pod Autoscaler with Custom Metrics?

A Horizontal Pod Autoscaler with Custom Metrics allows scaling based on application-specific metrics beyond CPU and memory. It enables more sophisticated scaling decisions based on business-relevant indicators. Custom metrics can be collected from various sources and used to inform autoscaling behavior.

In the world of software engineering, the concept of containerization and orchestration has revolutionized the way applications are developed, deployed, and managed. One of the key components of this paradigm is the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) with custom metrics. This article will delve into the intricacies of this concept, providing a comprehensive understanding of its definition, explanation, history, use cases, and specific examples.

The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler, often referred to as HPA, is a critical component in the Kubernetes ecosystem. It is designed to automatically scale the number of pods in a replication controller, deployment, replica set, or stateful set based on observed CPU utilization. However, with the addition of custom metrics, the HPA's functionality extends beyond just CPU utilization, allowing it to scale based on a wide array of metrics, providing greater flexibility and control over application scaling.

Definition of Horizontal Pod Autoscaler with Custom Metrics

The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler is a feature in Kubernetes that automatically adjusts the number of pods in a replication controller, deployment, replica set, or stateful set based on defined criteria. These criteria can be CPU utilization or, with the addition of custom metrics, virtually any other application-specific metrics.

Custom metrics, on the other hand, are user-defined metrics that extend the functionality of the HPA. They allow the HPA to scale based on a wide array of metrics, such as memory usage, request rate, custom business metrics, and more. This provides greater flexibility and control over application scaling, allowing developers to fine-tune their applications to meet specific performance and resource utilization targets.

Components of HPA with Custom Metrics

The HPA with custom metrics consists of several key components. The first is the HPA itself, which is responsible for monitoring the defined metrics and adjusting the number of pods accordingly. The HPA operates based on a set of defined rules, which specify the metrics to monitor and the thresholds that trigger scaling.

The second component is the custom metrics themselves. These are user-defined metrics that are monitored by the HPA. They can be virtually any metric that can be measured by the application, providing a high degree of flexibility in defining the conditions that trigger scaling.

How HPA with Custom Metrics Works

The HPA with custom metrics operates by continuously monitoring the defined metrics. When the value of a metric crosses a defined threshold, the HPA adjusts the number of pods to bring the metric back within the desired range. This is done by either increasing or decreasing the number of pods, depending on whether the metric is above or below the threshold.

The process of adjusting the number of pods is known as scaling. When the metric is above the threshold, the HPA performs a scaling out operation, which increases the number of pods. Conversely, when the metric is below the threshold, the HPA performs a scaling in operation, which decreases the number of pods. This ensures that the application always has the right amount of resources to meet its performance and resource utilization targets.

Explanation of Containerization and Orchestration

Containerization is a method of packaging an application along with its runtime dependencies, in a container, which can run uniformly and consistently on any infrastructure. This eliminates the "it works on my machine" problem, ensuring that the application behaves the same way in development, testing, and production environments.

Orchestration, on the other hand, is the automated configuration, coordination, and management of computer systems, services, and applications. In the context of containerization, orchestration involves managing the lifecycle of containers, especially in large, dynamic environments.

Components of Containerization

Containerization involves several key components. The first is the container itself, which is a standalone executable package that includes everything needed to run an application, including the code, runtime, system tools, system libraries, and settings.

The second component is the container runtime, which is the software that runs and manages containers. Examples of container runtimes include Docker, containerd, and rkt. The container runtime is responsible for pulling container images, starting and stopping containers, and managing container lifecycle.

Components of Orchestration

Orchestration involves several key components. The first is the orchestration platform, which is the software that manages the lifecycle of containers. Examples of orchestration platforms include Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and Apache Mesos.

The second component is the orchestration manifest, which is a declarative configuration file that describes the desired state of the orchestrated system. The orchestration platform uses the manifest to create, update, and manage the state of the system.

History of Horizontal Pod Autoscaler with Custom Metrics

The concept of autoscaling in cloud computing has been around for several years, with major cloud providers like Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure offering autoscaling features for their virtual machine instances. However, the introduction of containerization and orchestration platforms like Kubernetes brought a new level of sophistication to autoscaling.

The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler was introduced in Kubernetes v1.1 as a beta feature, providing the ability to automatically scale the number of pods in a replication controller, deployment, replica set, or stateful set based on observed CPU utilization. However, this initial implementation of the HPA had a significant limitation: it could only scale based on CPU utilization, which is not always the best indicator of application load.

Introduction of Custom Metrics

The introduction of custom metrics in Kubernetes v1.6 addressed this limitation, allowing the HPA to scale based on virtually any application-specific metrics. This opened up a whole new world of possibilities for application scaling, providing greater flexibility and control over how applications respond to changes in load.

Since then, the use of the HPA with custom metrics has become a standard practice in Kubernetes deployments, with many organizations leveraging this feature to optimize their application performance and resource utilization.

Use Cases of Horizontal Pod Autoscaler with Custom Metrics

The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler with custom metrics can be used in a wide variety of scenarios. Some of the most common use cases include scaling based on memory usage, request rate, custom business metrics, and more.

For example, an e-commerce application might scale based on the number of active shopping carts, a video streaming application might scale based on the number of active streams, and a data processing application might scale based on the size of the input data queue. These are just a few examples of how the HPA with custom metrics can be used to optimize application performance and resource utilization.

Scaling Based on Memory Usage

One common use case for the HPA with custom metrics is scaling based on memory usage. In this scenario, the HPA monitors the memory usage of the pods and adjusts the number of pods to ensure that memory usage stays within a defined range.

This can be particularly useful for applications that have variable memory usage patterns. For example, a data processing application might have high memory usage during peak processing times and low memory usage during off-peak times. By scaling based on memory usage, the HPA can ensure that the application has enough resources during peak times without wasting resources during off-peak times.

Scaling Based on Request Rate

Another common use case for the HPA with custom metrics is scaling based on request rate. In this scenario, the HPA monitors the rate of incoming requests and adjusts the number of pods to ensure that the application can handle the load.

This can be particularly useful for applications that experience sudden spikes in traffic. For example, a news website might experience a surge in traffic when a major news event occurs. By scaling based on request rate, the HPA can ensure that the website remains responsive even during peak traffic periods.

Examples of Horizontal Pod Autoscaler with Custom Metrics

Let's consider a specific example to illustrate how the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler with custom metrics works. Suppose we have a web application that serves dynamic content to users. The application is deployed on a Kubernetes cluster and uses a Redis cache to improve performance.

The application's performance is heavily dependent on the hit rate of the Redis cache. If the hit rate drops below a certain level, the application's performance degrades significantly. To prevent this, we can use the HPA with custom metrics to automatically scale the number of application pods based on the Redis cache hit rate.

Setting Up the HPA with Custom Metrics

The first step in setting up the HPA with custom metrics is to define the custom metric. In this case, the custom metric is the Redis cache hit rate. This can be done using a custom metrics API, which allows us to define and expose custom metrics to the HPA.

Once the custom metric is defined, we can create a HorizontalPodAutoscaler resource that specifies the custom metric as the scaling criteria. The HorizontalPodAutoscaler resource includes a reference to the deployment that should be scaled, the custom metric that should be monitored, and the target value for the custom metric.

How the HPA with Custom Metrics Works in This Scenario

Once the HorizontalPodAutoscaler resource is created, the HPA starts monitoring the Redis cache hit rate. If the hit rate drops below the target value, the HPA increases the number of pods in the deployment to improve the cache hit rate. Conversely, if the hit rate is above the target value, the HPA decreases the number of pods to save resources.

This ensures that the application always has the right amount of resources to maintain a high cache hit rate, optimizing both application performance and resource utilization. This example illustrates the power and flexibility of the HPA with custom metrics, making it a valuable tool in any Kubernetes deployment.

High-impact engineers ship 2x faster with Graph
Ready to join the revolution?
High-impact engineers ship 2x faster with Graph
Ready to join the revolution?

Code happier

Join the waitlist