What are Seccomp Profiles?

Seccomp Profiles in Kubernetes define which system calls a container is allowed to make. They're used to restrict the actions a container can perform, enhancing security. Seccomp Profiles are an important tool for implementing the principle of least privilege in containerized environments.

In the realm of containerization and orchestration, seccomp (Secure Computing Mode) profiles play a significant role in enhancing the security of containers. A seccomp profile is a collection of system calls that a process running in a container is allowed to make, providing a mechanism to restrict the system calls that a container can make to the kernel, thereby limiting its potential actions and reducing the attack surface.

The concept of seccomp profiles is an integral part of the broader topic of container security, which is itself a subset of the larger field of containerization and orchestration. This article delves into the intricate details of seccomp profiles, their history, their use cases, and specific examples of their application.

Definition of Seccomp Profiles

Seccomp, an abbreviation for Secure Computing Mode, is a security feature in the Linux kernel. It allows a process to make a one-way transition into a "secure" state where it cannot make any system calls except exit(), sigreturn(), and read() or write() to already-open file descriptors. If it attempts any other system calls, the kernel will terminate the process with SIGKILL or SIGSYS.

A seccomp profile, therefore, is a specification that defines the set of system calls that a process is permitted to make. It is a JSON file that lists the system calls and the action to take (allow, deny, trap, etc.) when a process attempts to make those calls. This provides a mechanism to limit the capabilities of a process, enhancing the security of the system.

Components of a Seccomp Profile

A seccomp profile consists of several components. The 'defaultAction' field specifies the action to take for system calls that are not explicitly listed in the profile. This is typically set to 'SCMP_ACT_ERRNO' to return an error for unlisted system calls.

The 'architectures' field specifies the CPU architectures to which the profile applies. The 'syscalls' field is an array of system call specifications, each of which includes a 'names' field listing the system calls and an 'action' field specifying the action to take.

History of Seccomp Profiles

Seccomp was first introduced in the Linux kernel 2.6.12, released in June 2005. It was initially very restrictive, allowing processes to only call exit(), read(), write(), and sigreturn(). This mode, now known as 'strict mode', was not widely used due to its limitations.

In Linux kernel 3.5, released in July 2012, a new mode called 'filter mode' was introduced. This mode allows processes to specify a filter of system calls they want to make, providing much greater flexibility. This mode is what is typically referred to as seccomp today.

Adoption of Seccomp Profiles

Seccomp profiles were quickly adopted in various areas of computing, particularly in containerization and orchestration. Docker, for example, started using seccomp profiles in version 1.10, released in February 2016. This provided a significant boost to the security of Docker containers.

Other containerization and orchestration tools, such as Kubernetes and OpenShift, also adopted seccomp profiles, recognizing their potential in enhancing container security. Today, seccomp profiles are a standard feature in most containerization and orchestration tools.

Use Cases of Seccomp Profiles

Seccomp profiles have a wide range of use cases, particularly in the field of containerization and orchestration. They are used to enhance the security of containers by restricting the system calls that a container can make, thereby reducing its attack surface.

For example, a container running a web server might only need to make a small subset of system calls, such as those for network communication and file I/O. A seccomp profile for this container can be created that only allows these system calls, denying all others.

Examples of Seccomp Profiles

Here is an example of a simple seccomp profile that allows only the read(), write(), and exit() system calls:


{
 "defaultAction": "SCMP_ACT_ERRNO",
 "architectures": ["SCMP_ARCH_X86_64"],
 "syscalls": [
   {
     "names": ["read", "write", "exit"],
     "action": "SCMP_ACT_ALLOW"
   }
 ]
}

This profile can be used to run a process in a highly restricted environment, where it can only read from and write to already-open file descriptors, and exit.

Creating and Applying Seccomp Profiles

Creating a seccomp profile involves specifying the system calls to allow or deny and the actions to take. This is typically done in a JSON file, which can then be loaded into the kernel using the prctl() or seccomp() system calls.

Applying a seccomp profile to a container involves specifying the path to the profile file in the container's configuration. The exact method depends on the containerization tool being used. For example, in Docker, the --security-opt option can be used to specify the seccomp profile:


docker run --security-opt seccomp=/path/to/profile.json ...

Tools for Creating Seccomp Profiles

There are several tools available for creating seccomp profiles. One of the most popular is the seccomp library (libseccomp), which provides a high-level interface to the seccomp functionality in the Linux kernel. This library provides functions for creating, loading, and managing seccomp profiles.

Another tool is the seccomp-nurse, which provides a sandbox environment for testing seccomp profiles. This can be useful for testing the effects of a profile before applying it to a production environment.

Limitations and Challenges of Seccomp Profiles

While seccomp profiles provide a powerful mechanism for enhancing container security, they also have some limitations and challenges. One of the main challenges is the complexity of creating and managing seccomp profiles. Each system call needs to be considered individually, and the effects of allowing or denying a system call can be difficult to predict.

Another challenge is the performance overhead of seccomp. Each system call made by a process is checked against the seccomp profile, which can add a significant amount of overhead, particularly for processes that make a large number of system calls.

Overcoming the Challenges

There are several strategies for overcoming the challenges of seccomp profiles. One strategy is to use tools that simplify the creation and management of seccomp profiles, such as the seccomp library (libseccomp).

Another strategy is to use a minimal seccomp profile that only allows the system calls necessary for the application to function. This reduces the performance overhead of seccomp by minimizing the number of system calls that need to be checked.

Future of Seccomp Profiles

The future of seccomp profiles looks promising, with ongoing development in the Linux kernel and in containerization and orchestration tools. New features and improvements are being added to seccomp, such as the ability to specify arguments to system calls in seccomp profiles.

With the increasing popularity of containers and the growing awareness of the importance of container security, the use of seccomp profiles is likely to continue to increase. As more tools and libraries are developed to simplify the creation and management of seccomp profiles, their adoption is likely to become even more widespread.

High-impact engineers ship 2x faster with Graph
Ready to join the revolution?
High-impact engineers ship 2x faster with Graph
Ready to join the revolution?

Code happier

Join the waitlist